Apple and LG Electronics Face Trial Over Alcatel-Lucent Patents
By Bill Callahan – Nov 27, 2012 12:00 AM ET
Apple Inc. (AAPL) and LG Electronics Inc. (066570) are set to face trial over claims by anAlcatel-Lucent SA (ALU) unit that they infringed patents for electronic devices including phones and computers.
The jury trial, scheduled to begin today in federal court in San Diego, stems from a 2010 lawsuit by the Paris-based company’s Multimedia Patent Trust accusing Apple and LG Electronics of copying video-compression technology that allows data to be sent more efficiently over communications media, including the Internet and satellites, or stored on DVDs and Blu-Ray disks.
The trust claims its patents are infringed by products including multiple versions of Apple’s iPhone, iPod, iPad and MacBook, as well as LG Electronics’s Chocolate Touch VX8575, Bliss UX700, Touch AX8575, Lotus Elite LX610, Mystique UN610 and Samba LG8575.
The Alcatel-Lucent patent trust said in court filings that it seeks a “reasonable royalty” based on what it would have been paid if a licensing agreement had been reached before the infringements began.
Those licensing negotiations would have occurred in 2005 for the Apple products and 2009 for the LG Electronics products, according to court filings. Apple is accused of infringing three Alcatel-Lucent patents and LG Electronics is alleged to have infringed two of the patents.
Apple, based in Cupertino, California, and Seoul-based LG Electronics have rejected claims their products infringe the Alcatel-Lucent patents and said in court filings that the technology at issue is only a small part of products that contain many components.
The Alcatel-Lucent trust didn’t specify in pretrial filings how much it seeks in damages. According to court filings, a financial expert for the trust estimated that licensing negotiations could have resulted in Apple paying a $195.9 million royalty and LG Electronics a $9.1 million royalty.
U.S. District Judge Marilyn Huff ruled that some of the economic assumptions made by the patent trust’s expert weren’t proper and said those figures should be adjusted.
The case is Multimedia Patent Trust v. Apple, 3:10- cv-02618, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego).
To contact the reporter on this story: Peter Blumberg in San Francisco email@example.com
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at firstname.lastname@example.org